Because live albums almost always suck. Even when the performances
are good, even when the singer comes up with new and exciting phrasings
and the band is making palpable contact with the audience, establishing
lines of communication with strangers through means so abstract that
its a miracle any of it ever happens at all -- even in these
rare circumstances, live albums are usually a great big yawn. I loved
them when I was a kid, because I couldnt see any of the bands
and ached to do so, but when one puts sentimental concerns aside and
looks at these things with a cold analytical eye, the pictures
not very pretty. Only jam bands like the Allman Brothers or jazz ensembles
really have any excuse for putting out live albums, since group improvisation
is usually best undertaken in front of an audience: it keeps performers
on their toes. These are some fairly specific exceptions. Otherwise,
what do you get? Guitar
solos, spoken monologues, artificially
bolstered cheering sounds, and the feeling that your money would
have been better spent on random albums by groups youd never
heard of. |