Which is exactly the difference between
Interpol and the ten thousand or so bands that’ve been aping
eighties moves for bar money these past couple of years. (When will
this trend end, anyhow? Is there a limit to how much mining people
are allowed to do in the fertile fields of the first two Public Image
Ltd. albums, or shall we just call the eighties revival “PiLcore”
and be done with it?) On their debut album, Interpol sound like people
who have seen a vision and decided to follow it. It’s in the
album’s unbendingly mournful mood, and in how tense the overall
feeling is: it’s in the cool detachment of the band’s
professionalism. It’s as if their commitment to the structures
of their songs is so great that they’re afraid something bad
might happen were they to stray from the path. Culturally speaking,
we tend to pooh-pooh the idea of control; advertising is full of voices
that extol the virtues of pulling out all the stops and indulging
oneself in the pleasures of bleeding-edge experiences. Let us not
forget that James Brown’s band used to routinely locate the
burning nexus of ecstasy not in wild abandon but at the outer reaches
of control and discipline, and that locating this same point on the
map was what made “Master of Puppets” such a charging
beast of a record. |
|